|
Internet Standards and the Request For Comment (RFC) Process
(Page 2 of 3)
RFC Categories
As before, not all RFCs are official
Internet standards, which is important to remember. Each RFC has a category
or status associated with it that indicates its disposition:
- Proposed Standard / Draft Standard / Standard:
These are documents that describe technologies said to be on the
standards track. That means they are either already formally
approved as standards, or they are likely to become standards in the
future. In many cases, the document is just given as Standards
Track as opposed to one of those three precise labels. See below
for more information.
- Best Current Practice: A document providing
guideline information or recommendations from the IETF that is not a
formal standard.
- Informational: A document that provides
general information or commentary.
- Experimental: A proposal for an experimental
standard that is not on the standards track. In some cases, protocols
or proposed changes to existing protocols that are not accepted as formal
standards are changed to experimental status.
- Historic: Former standards that have been
obsoleted.
| If you find The TCP/IP Guide useful, please consider making a small Paypal donation to help the site, using one of the buttons below. You can also donate a custom amount using the far right button (not less than $1 please, or PayPal gets most/all of your money!) In lieu of a larger donation, you may wish to consider purchasing a download license of The TCP/IP Guide. Thanks for your support! |
|
|
Home -
Table Of Contents - Contact Us
The TCP/IP Guide (http://www.TCPIPGuide.com)
Version 3.0 - Version Date: September 20, 2005
© Copyright 2001-2005 Charles M. Kozierok. All Rights Reserved.
Not responsible for any loss resulting from the use of this site.
|